DISPATCH / OPERATIONS VISIBILITY
A full calendar
is only part of the story.
Explore the gaps, overloaded days and jobs running beyond their plan. The board below is an interactive synthetic operations example, not live routing or tracking.
Four technicians × eight scheduled hours gives 32 technician-hours of capacity per day in this example. Compare the same 156 booked hours across five days.
Synthetic demonstration data · hypothetical technician-hours, not a route optimisation result. Travel, breaks, skill requirements and geographic constraints are omitted. Rescheduling requires checking each job with the customer.
Inspect daily capacity and bookings
JOB EXCEPTIONS / EXPLORE THE SIGNALS
Two days planned.
Five days on site.
A status alone does not explain the delay. Bring elapsed time, the original plan, staffing and the discovery note into the same review.
Why the gaps matter
An under-booked slot may be usable for a nearby follow-up, subject to technician skills and customer availability. The board makes that question visible.
Why overload matters
More booked hours than available hours signals a scheduling conflict. Moving work is a decision that needs travel, timing and scope checks.
Why staffing matters
Four people assigned to a two-person task may tie up capacity elsewhere. Understaffing may also explain a delay. Review the requirement before changing the crew.
Why photo records matter
Before-work, discovery and completion photos add context to the job. Keep them with the original scope and any changes so the invoice review has a clear record.